Can a paper get rejected after a major revision?

Can a paper get rejected after a major revision?

The only stage where an editorial decision will be warranted is for minor or stylistic, cosmetic or maybe adding a few additional references. This would correspond to all reviewers suggesting that the paper be accepted with minor revisions. Any revision of the scientific content will generally need to be re-reviewed.

What does it mean to revise a paper?

What does it mean to revise? Revision literally means to “see again,” to look at something from a fresh, critical perspective. It is an ongoing process of rethinking the paper: reconsidering your arguments, reviewing your evidence, refining your purpose, reorganizing your presentation, reviving stale prose. Nope. That’s called proofreading.

What to do during revision of an essay?

During the revision stage of the writing process, writers may add, remove, moveand substitutetext (the ARMS treatment).

What does it mean when a paper is nominated for major revision?

Therefore, if the paper is initially nominated for the major revision, it means that the work has sufficient novelty to be published. dont forget that some papers propose a reject and resubmit as a standard…that way, they artificially decrease the time between submitted paper and published paper, which is a simple trick.

Do you do two rounds of major revision?

The reviewers all indicated that the paper would make a positive contrition to the field in the first round of review and asked me to make a major revision. I revised the manuscript according to their review and all reviewers indicated that they like my revision.

What does it mean when a paper is rejected?

Normally a paper is rejected when all the reviewers clearly reject the paper. Actually there are some editors who do this, they reject the paper but they also state that you are welcomed to resubmit a revised manuscript.

Why did the second reviewer reject my paper?

The second reviewer’s concerns were basically that he believes that one of the databases used in the paper (which is used in many other studies published in this journal) is completely invalid, but to back up their claim they posted links to a bunch of blog articles.

What to do when you get a rejection for a paper?

To decide on a strategy, it’s important to understand the reasons behind a rejection. When you get a peer review report, it’s usually easy to extract the criticism on your paper and plan your next steps accordingly.

What should you do if your paper is rejected without peer review?

Rejection is part of every academic’s life. Still, getting a paper rejected can sting. Or it is at least annoying because it means extra work. But what should you do after your paper was rejected without peer review? Should you submit your paper to another journal as it is? Revise it before? Write an appeal letter to the editor?

Can a journal rescind a rejection of a manuscript?

To rescind the agreement just because of a back-log of articles is unacceptable behaviour by the journal. The only justification for reversing the decision would be if the integrity of the accepted paper were compromised in some way.