Emma Jonson Can the editor be the reviewer?
So in conclusion, yes, editors can add reviews but should do so with extreme caution and rarity. Yes, it’s appropriate.
How do you accept a review on a paper?
Reviewing a paper
- Don’t start your review when you are not in a good mood.
- Be responsible and do it in time.
- Try to write in a simple and clear English.
- Be open to new ideas and don’t try to take the author to what you want.
- Complicated papers are not necessarily of good quality.
How do you ask about the status of a journal submission?
Here is a template that you can use to inquire about the current status of your paper: Dear Mr./Ms. XXX [Editor’s Name], I have submitted my revised manuscript titled XXXX [manuscript id: xxxx] to your journal via the online submission system on dd/mm/yyyy [date of submission].
How do I decline a review paper?
Tip: Declining an invitation Tell the journal if you know of other researchers who might be qualified to review the manuscript. This will help keep the review process moving quickly. It’s also a good idea to let the journal know why you’re declining the invitation.
How do you write a reviewer comment?
Do
- Justify your recommendation with concrete evidence and specific examples.
- Be specific so the authors know what they need to do to improve.
- Be thorough. This might be the only time you read the manuscript.
- Be professional and respectful.
- Remember to say what you liked about the manuscript!
How long does it take to hear back from an academic journal?
The time it takes for a journal to get the review process completed varies across journals and fields. While some take a month or two, others can take up to 6 months or more. As you have correctly observed, Statistics/Mathematics journals usually take a longer time, and may at times, take even up to a year to complete.
Do you have to respond to reviewer comments?
Not every reviewer is an expert in the exact field he’s asked to review. It is often hard for a journal to find enough reviewers for a paper. Or perhaps the Editor-in-Chief is not familiar with this area, and assigned the paper to a reviewer from a different field. Nevertheless, the reviewer gave his opinion, and you have to respond to it.
What to do if your paper is rejected by a reviewer?
Any indication that the reviewer misunderstood your paper suggests you may need to make some changes. If your paper was rejected because of the review, you have to opportunity to appeal the decision. But remember that it is the Editor-in-Chief who makes the decision to reject. Only appeal if you really think the review misjudged your paper.
How does the review process help you improve your paper?
The review process should help you to improve your paper. The review process is usually “blind”, so the reviewer will not know author names or affiliations. If you can fix the problem with your paper, then do so. If this requires more experimental research, ask the Editor before proceeding, and indicate the likely time frame.
How to ask for feedback during a performance review?
They can be made even more difficult if there are problems that need to be discussed. However, they don`t need to be. By having the right attitude, asking the right questions and looking at the review as a chance to communicate and improve the company`s performance, performance reviews can be an extremely positive experience.