Do reviewers ask for raw data?

Do reviewers ask for raw data?

Examine Raw Data Related to statistics, peer reviewers also do not check raw data. This would make the review process very cumbersome and time-consuming, so any issues with the original data collected may not be apparent in the draft seen by manuscript reviewers.

Why do scientists not present raw data?

Publication bias. Reproducibility problem. Abusing statistical tests.

Can raw data be made public?

Scientists are failing to make raw data publicly available, even when prompted to do so by journals, says a study published last week in PLoS ONE 1. The findings come amid a growing push for sharing raw research data — both to facilitate further research and to better prevent fraud or error.

Does raw data exist?

In this sense, “raw data” is indeed a contradiction in terms. In the ordinary use of the term “raw data,” “raw” signifies that no processing was performed following data collection, but the term obscures the various forms of processing that necessarily occur before data collection.

What are some examples of raw data?

Examples of Raw Data

  • A list of every purchase at a store during a month but with no further structure or analysis.
  • Every second of footage recorded by a security camera overnight.
  • The grades of all of the students in a school district for a quarter.
  • A list of every movie being streamed by video streaming company.

Do journals ask raw data?

However, the Forum agreed that it is not practical to ask authors to submit their raw data, although some journals do ask for certain types of data to be deposited in a public database and some journals ask for original digital images.

Why raw data is not useful?

There are several serious drawbacks to this approach: Raw data can often be out-of-date, denormalized, or poorly structured. There is no built-in capacity for consistency, version control, and collaboration. All-in-one solutions are often black boxes.

What does raw data look like?

Raw data (also called text data or similar) is stored in a format that is completely independent form any software and can be edited using a simple text editor. Data values appear on a single line for each observation as a sequence of values (variable sequence), separated by a separator.

Who works with raw data only?

The task of a Data Scientist is to unearth future insights from raw data. Data engineer focuses on development and maintenance of data pipelines. Data analyst mainly take actions that affect the company’s scope.

How is raw data collected?

Raw data is a set of information that was delivered from a certain data entity to the data provider and hasn’t been processed yet by machine nor human. This information is gathered out of online sources to deliver deep insight into users’ online behavior.

Which of the following is definition of raw data?

Raw data or primary data are collected directly related to their object of study (statistical units). In contrast to raw data, we speak of secondary data if the data have already been aggregated and thus no longer contain all of the information of the original investigation. …

How do you present raw data?

SOME GENERAL RULES

  1. Keep it simple.
  2. First general, then specific.
  3. Data should answer the research questions identified earlier.
  4. Leave the process of data collection to the methods section.
  5. Always use past tense in describing results.
  6. Text, tables or graphics?

Do you have to share raw data with other scientists?

In recognition of the benefits of transparent reporting, many peer-reviewed journals require that their authors be prepared to share their raw, unprocessed data with other scientists and/or state the availability of raw data in published articles. But little information on how data should be prepared for publication – or sharing – has emerged.

What does it mean to share’raw data’?

The lack of access to raw data, they say, impedes attempts to replicate scientific results, or to serendipitous discoveries by people looking at data sets that were collected for some other purpose. The problem has to do with the specific form of the raw data, and it turns out that defining “raw” is a little trickier than it might seem.

Do you need consent to anonymise raw data?

Although consent is not required in law to process anonymised data, ideally informed consent should be obtained from research participants for the publication of suitably anonymised raw data, as part of the recruitment process, for all new studies.

When is it safe to publish raw data?

In such cases, researchers may publish raw data if it is clear and demonstrable that there is no threat to anonymity–for example, if the dataset includes no direct identifiers and fewer than three indirect identifiers.