Emma Jonson How to respond to a comment from a reviewer?
Reviewers’ Comments to the Authors: Reviewer 1 . There are numerous strengths to this study, including its diverse sample and wellinformed hypotheses.- Author response: Thank you! 1. Comment from Reviewer 1 noting a mistake or oversight in the manuscript. Author response: Thank you for pointing this out. The reviewer is correct, and we have
What should be included in a response to reviewers document?
A well-crafted “response to reviewers” document is a critical part of your response. This document is submitted alongside your revised manuscript, summarizing the changes that you made in response to the critiques.
What happens if you don’t respond to a reviewer?
A frequent complaint from reviewers is that the authors failed to respond at all to several points raised in the review. In some cases, the reviewer may disagree with your response, but you should not try to avoid a difficult point by simply ignoring it.
Why does a reviewer ask so many questions?
In some cases, the question the reviewer asks reveals a deeper misunderstanding about the overall study or some of the assumptions therein. When specific comments seem off-base, and especially when a single reviewer has many such comments, this may be because the manuscript does not sufficiently explain the hypothesis it aims to address.
When do you need to suggest a reviewer?
Often journals require authors to suggest reviewers during the manuscript submission process. Potential reviewers are independent experts in your field of research.
What happens when a manuscript comes back from a reviewer?
Once you manuscript has come back from reviewers you may be given the opportunity to revise it in accordance with the reviewer comments. You will usually receive a letter from the editor who handled your manuscript outlining the changes they would like you to make and links to the reviewer reports.
Do you have to be anonymous to be a reviewer in a journal?
The reviewer’s identity can be anonymous or disclosed depending on the journal’s policies. Often journals require authors to suggest reviewers during the manuscript submission process. Potential reviewers are independent experts in your field of research.
What are the comments on this research paper?
Reviewer 1 comment: Comment:This was an excellent report on very thorough research. The literature review was thorough, the methodology was painstakingly thorough and incorporated the use of sufficient numbers of samples in dust size analysis and explosion tests.
What is the response to reviewers’comments in the BMJ?
Response to reviewers’ comments We are very grateful for the reviews provided by the editors and each of the external reviewers of this manuscript. The comments are encouraging and the reviewers appear to share our judgement that this study and its results are clinically important. Please see below, in blue, our detailed response to comments.
How to respond to a negative review on a website?
Before we dive into each type of negative review and how to respond, there is an overarching framework that you’ll want to apply when responding to negative feedback. Personalize the response with the reviewer’s name when possible. Some review sites require a name, and others allow pseudonyms. This is an indicator.
How to respond to a reviewer on a manuscript?
You should definitely address each of the reviewers individually as you respond to his or her comments, aiming for a layout that makes it absolutely clear which comment you are responding to at any given moment and exactly what you have changed in your manuscript.
What should you do with feedback from reviewers?
We appreciate the time and effort that you and the reviewers dedicated to providing feedback on our manuscript and are grateful for the insightful comments on and valuable improvements to our paper. We have incorporated most of the suggestions made by the reviewers. Those changes are highlighted within the manuscript.
Why does the reviewer not know who the author is?
The review process is usually “blind”, so the reviewer does not know who the author is. Perhaps you think the reviewer guessed you were non-English speaking, or even from China, and was prejudiced because of that. Perhaps you think the author is biased against certain view points, or research fields.
Where can I find a reviewer report form?
For the evaluation of the paper, a reviewer窶冱 report form is provided on the online reviewing system for you to ・〕l in, dealing with the appropriateness of the presentation and scienti・… quality of the paper.
How to write a review of a paper?
窶・Begin your review with a concise summary of the essential points of the paper both for the editor窶冱 use and to ensure that you have understood the work. 窶・Next, evaluate the quality of the work. Give evaluations and comments on each of the publication criteria by following the sections of the reviewer report form.
How do I view annotation feedback in canvas?
Your instructor may choose to include comments directly in an assignment submission using inline comments, or annotations. If an assignment’s submission details page includes a View Feedback button, you can view these annotated comments through a preview tool called Canvas DocViewer.
What happens if you don’t respond to a customer review?
If you don’t respond, you only signal to potential customers that the reviewer is right, or that you don’t care about serving customers well. Responding is an opportunity – not something to be afraid of. So, a customer had a bad experience.
How to respond to a review of a book?
Your responses will tend to reflect your attitude at the time of writing. Word choice, tone, syntax—they may all reveal to the reader your true colors. I’ve edited letters to reviewers that conveyed the message that their authors did not welcome criticism to their manuscripts.
Why are reviewers required to cite their own work?
The editorial board and editor-in-chief agreed to wait until hearing from the handling editor before contacting the reviewers. The handling editor responded with a letter that stated that he requested citation of his own work more often than others’ work because he was most familiar with his own work.
How often do reviewers cite the handling editor?
The four regular reviewers requested citation of the handling editor’s work much more frequently than they requested citation of papers he had not authored, and most of the citations they requested that were not the handling editor’s were of papers they themselves had co-authored.
Why do authors use citations in their papers?
Overall, self-citations are a way of self promotion – yes, you point the reader to your earlier relevant works in the topic, but you also advertise your previous papers in hope that those that missed them will cite them in their own future articles. Citations are a valuable asset in academia, so it’s not surprising authors go after them.
Why is the reviewer judging my English more harshly?
Author: You think the reviewer is judging your English more harshly because it’s from China. Most journals operate a “blind” peer review, i.e. anything identifying the author is removed before sending for review. However, there are often clues within the paper, such as mentions of previous publications, or of Chinese research.
What should you do if a reviewer suggests a rejection?
Editors say, “If a reviewer suggests a rejection, but her/his comments are not detailed or helpful, it does not help the editor in making a decision.” In your recommendations for the author, you should: Give constructive feedback describing ways that they could improve the research; Keep the focus on the research and not the author.
How often should you respond to peer reviewer comments?
If you feel this way, it is important to give yourself some time, rather than address the comments in that state of mind. Re-read the comments several times over the next few days.
Is the name of the reviewer disclosed to the author?
The reviewer’s name isn’t disclosed to the author. Double-anonymous review (also called ‘double-blind peer review’). The identity of the reviewers and the authors aren’t disclosed. Open review. Both the author and reviewer names are disclosed.
How to respond to a negative customer review?
Perhaps the most important step of any negative review response is taking it offline. Offer a direct email address, phone number, and your name when appropriate so the reviewer can get in touch and you can deliver on the promise you made to make it right. This allows the rest of the conversation to be between you and the dissatisfied customer.
How to request service by publication or posting?
If you need more space, you can attach a declaration. You can use a blank sheet of paper or use a Declaration ( Form MC-030 ). Also attach any other documents showing your search results. If you are asking for permission to do service by posting, fill out a Request to Waive Court Fees ( Form FW-001 ).
Is there an article processing fee for a JMIR letter?
There is no Article Processing Fee for letters. Most JMIR journals do not currently publish “research letters” (i.e. short communications with original data), but some do (see What are the Article Types ). Letters are not usually peer-reviewed (like original papers), but are reviewed by the author of the paper the letter comments on or critiques.
How to respond to a negative review on broadly?
The team at Broadly recommends the following steps to construct an effective response to a negative review. 1. ACKNOWLEDGE THE ISSUE In most cases, even if you don’t think the customer is right, it’s important to acknowledge the issue. For example, begin your response with something like this:
Is it normal to get comments on your paper?
So it should be no surprise to anyone who submits a scientific paper for publication that the editor and several reviewers will nearly always find problems or want to see changes in the paper. It is a normal part of the path to publication. You cannot control what the reviewers say. But you can control how you respond to their comments.
What should A reviewer consider when reviewing an article?
Reviewers should consider the following questions: Does the abstract accurately summarize the contents of the manuscript? Does the Author provide information about the person of interest’s background, i.e., where they are from, where they were educated, etc.?
What are the elements of a review paper?
Analyze, Synthesize, Interpret. A review paper is not a pure summary of the information you read for your review. You are required to analyze, synthesize, and interpret the information you read in some meaningful way.
How to write a well focused review paper?
A well focused paper is crucial in getting your message across to your reader. Organize your points. Keeping your points organized makes it easier for the reader to follow along and make sense of your review. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence that relates back to your thesis.
Can a peer reviewer cut and paste your response?
Editors may cut and paste and share your responses as they see fit to achieve the results they envision for your paper, so be prepared for this possibility.
How to respond to a negative review on a book?
Do not take a negative comment from the reviewer as a personal attack. Try to look at it with a neutral perspective and address it to the best of your ability. Avoid using phrases like “we completely disagree” in your rebuttal letter.
How to respond to a positive customer review?
Since a customer who’s leaving a neutral review had elements of both a positive and negative experience, your response should incorporate elements of a positive review response and a negative review response. You might be noticing a common theme here. Say “thank you” for all of the customer feedback that you get.
How to respond to a negative peer review?
Do not take a negative comment from the reviewer as a personal attack. Try to look at it with a neutral perspective and address it to the best of your ability. Avoid using phrases like “we completely disagree” in your rebuttal letter. You can find a list of useful phrases to answer critical comments in Box 2 of this article.