Emma Jonson What makes a good referee report for a research paper?
These generally include: (i) the quality/appropriateness of the methodologies and techniques used in the research (ii) the quality of the logical arguments made to arrive at the key conclusions of the paper (iii) the clarity of the presentation The Essential Components of a Good Referee Report (3).
Can a referee tell if an article should be rejected?
When submitting papers to journals, I understand from experience that acceptance can take quite some time (on the order of several months), even when a reviewer is immediately assigned to the paper. But can a referee usually tell fairly quickly if the article should be rejected?
How to write a referee report Lance Cooper?
Tips For Writing Referee Reports Lance Cooper An enormous number of scientific articles are submitted daily Most journals rely on impartial, external reviewers to help evaluate, and decide the fate of, submitted papers This is generally performed as a service to the community, i.e., you don’t generally get paid to referee papers!
How long does it take to get a rejection from a journal?
Good luck! Short Answer: Desk rejects are quick, but if it goes out to review, then rejections tend to take as long as any other first-round outcome. So if you haven’t heard anything from a journal after 2 or more months, it probably means that your article has been sent out for review, but nothing more.
How to referee a Scienti C paper on professionalism?
As a referee, try to be: Objective, Quick, Professional, Honest, and Courteous. Treat the author with the courtesy due to a learned peer, and a fellow human being. 23. How to Referee a Scienti c Paper On Professionalism As a referee you work for theauthoras much as for the scienti c community at large.
How to referee a Scienti C paper natural selection?
How to Referee a Scienti\\fc Paper Natural Selection in (Computer) Science Role of the Referee The task of the referee is toevaluatein atimelymanner a paper for publication in a speci\\fc journal or conference pro- ceedings. (Alan Jay Smith.The Task of the Referee.) Keywords: \ Evaluation / Critical Judgment, and \ Timeliness. 4
Why does the referee say the proof is wrong?
The reason is that the referee thinks that our results are wrong or trivial. However, we carefully read the referee’s report and we conclude that the “errors” pointed out by the referee are not errors at all and that our proofs are correct. In all modesty, we think that the referee understood very poorly even the statements of our theorems.
What to look for in a boxing referee?
BoxRec lists the referee of this bout as Charlie Daggert; I can almost guarantee you that by the time we’re done looking at him you will be disgusted. Notice how Daggert, instead of being close to the action, is strolling around the ring. This is completely permissible.
How to referee a Scienti C paper evaluation?
How to Referee a Scienti\\fc Paper Evaluation / Critical Judgment At least, this involves judging: \ if the paper iscorrect, \ if the problem studied and the results ob- tained arenew and signi\\fcant, \ if the quality of the presentation isgood, and \ what changes might or should be made to the paper.