Emma Jonson What should be included in a referee report?
Provide a recommendation for or against publication Your recommendation can be equivocal if you provide sufficient discussion of the pros and cons of publication If you do recommend rejecting a paper, you can suggest alternate journals to which the paper might be more appropriately submitted (4). List essential and suggested changes to the paper
Why do you need to be a referee in science?
Lance Cooper An enormous number of scientific articles are submitted daily Most journals rely on impartial, external reviewers to help evaluate, and decide the fate of, submitted papers This is generally performed as a service to the community, i.e., you don’t generally get paid to referee papers! Why Referees are Needed in Science
How to write a referee report Lance Cooper?
Tips For Writing Referee Reports Lance Cooper An enormous number of scientific articles are submitted daily Most journals rely on impartial, external reviewers to help evaluate, and decide the fate of, submitted papers This is generally performed as a service to the community, i.e., you don’t generally get paid to referee papers!
How to ask someone to be a reference with letter examples?
You can ask someone to serve as a reference with a formal letter sent by mail or an email message. Get detailed tips on how to write a letter requesting permission to use someone as a reference. Choose whom to ask wisely. Typically, you need to provide potential employers with three references.
Referee report The first section of the report (often one paragraph) should contain a concise summary of the paper’s claimed results, contributions, and general line of reasoning. The editor is typically not an expert in the paper’s subfield, so it is important for this summary to be clear.
Are there any conflicts of interest for referees in nature?
To avoid such conflicts of interest, Nature requires potential referees to disclose any professional and commercial competing interests before undertaking to review a paper, and requires referees not to copy papers or to circulate them to un-named colleagues.
How is the choice of referees made in peer review?
Once the decision has been made to peer-review the paper, the choice of referees is made by the editor who has been assigned the manuscript, who will be handling other papers in the same field, in consultation with editors handling submissions in related fields when necessary.
Where do you put the Doi in a journal article?
Always include the issue number for a journal article. If the journal article does not have a DOI and is from an academic research database, end the reference after the page range (for an explanation of why, see the database information page). The reference in this case is the same as for a print journal article.
How to respond to a request for a reference check?
Asks whether the former employee is eligible for rehire by your organization. This paperwork is best left to Human Resources—at least, ask the HR staff to review any written response you may be thinking of sending. Do not answer questions that ask you to numerically rate a former employee in any aspect of their work or work characteristics.
When does the author get notified of a decision?
Decision made – notification imminent: The Action Editor has written an e-mail addressed to the corresponding author and the author will be notified of the decision as soon as the Managing Editor has proofread that e-mail or the Editor has checked it.
When does a paper get rejected by the editor?
Yes, when the editors did not agree with the content (it was against their beliefs). If a paper is out of scope or has language or structure issues, then it is usually rejected by a junior editor performing initial quality checks and the reasons are specified clearly in the rejection letter to the author.
Why do so many research papers get rejected?
Remember why you start at the beginning, and may the force be with you to achieve your goal – nothing is impossible! Rejection is the norm in academic publishing. Even researchers at the top of their field have experienced rejection. Several peer-reviewed studies have investigated the reasons that journals reject papers.
Is it normal for a journal to reject 80 percent of submissions?
Today, it is not unusual for a quality journal to reject 80 or more percent of submissions. Of course what is meant by “quality journal” may vary, but consensus dictates that this quality is the impact factor of the journal.
What to do if a referee is outside the public service?
If your referee is outside the public service explain to them what selection criteria are, their role in the selection process, and how the referee must focus on them in their comments. Your immediate supervisor or manager should be one of your referees. Selection panels prefer to speak to this person to gain an idea of your past performance.
What causes an article to be rejected by Elsevier?
See our ethical guidelines.) The manuscript is not complete; it may be lacking key elements such as the title, authors, affiliations, keywords, main text, references and all tables and figures). The English is not sufficient for the peer review process, The figures are not complete or are not clear enough to read.
Can You republish an article from another journal?
The article contains elements that are suspected to be plagiarized, or it is currently under review at another journal. (Republishing articles or parts of articles, submitting to one or more journals at the same time or using text or images without permission is not allowed. See our ethical guidelines.)
Is it the author’s responsibility to find reviewers?
I am very surprised if they mean by this that they are looking for reviewers who will send their opinion about the ms to the journal editor. This is incorrect, it is not the authors’ responsibility to find reviewers. Let me summarize my 30 years of experience in science publishing, as an author, and as a reviewer.
Do you have to be a reviewer for a journal?
Reviewers work for the editor, not for the authors. Some journal editors ask for authors to *suggest* reviewers. But this is only a suggestion. Most international journals don’t even ask for this suggestion. They don’t need to, they have the databases and the software to do this automatically.
Do you work for the editor or the reviewer?
Let me summarize my 30 years of experience in science publishing, as an author, and as a reviewer. Reviewers work for the editor, not for the authors. Some journal editors ask for authors to *suggest* reviewers. But this is only a suggestion.
Why does the other side want to negotiate with you?
The other side is negotiating with you for a reason, says Neale. “Your power and influence come from the unique properties you bring to the equation.” Make a list of what you want from the negotiation, and why. This exercise will help you determine what would cause you to walk away, so that you build your strategy within acceptable terms.
How many references should be included in a review paper?
The paper should include references to all relevant published work world-wide. Typically, papers contain at least 70 to 150 references, depending on the subject area Figures and tables, taken from past papers, (suitably acknowledged) should be used to illustrate major points made in the text The paper should not contain detailed standard bookwork.